MADDIE McCANN THE AGE PROGRESSION FARCE

WHY THE McCANN'S PERSIST

One of the main reasons the McCann's continue to push the awful age progression picture of poor dead little Maddie is fairly obvious and utterly in keeping with the ridiculous abduction scenario they put forward.
Let us not forget for one moment that the abduction story like the age progression picture is nothing more than a cynical attempt to influence people into thinking Maddie is alive, for if she is dead, then the dogs findings whilst significant enough to demand respect, are then insurmountable and the McCann's simply cannot allow that to happen.
Firstly you have to look at the backlash that this will cause. If Maddie is dead, which is almost utterly certain, Then the last people to see her alive are the parents, the last car she was in was the hire car hired by the parents moving her dead body. The last people to hold her dead body were the parents and alarmingly no one had ever died inside the apartment the parents rented apart from Maddie.
Add all that together and it is simple.

THE McCANN'S CANNOT AFFORD FOR MADDIE TO BE DEAD FOR ONE SOLITARY MOMENT.

The age progression picture is not only a disgustingly cynical but a recognised ploy to sway the general public's thinking.
It is actually shown that age progression pictures do alter people's perceptions of wether the victim is alive or dead.So it is a godsend for the parents and for another reason many will not have realised.

It is simply this...That age progression pictures are also proven to expand the number of people who may resemble the missing person and thus actually deflect from the real evidence that may lead to finding a narrower search path to the victim's killers.
Given that the McCann's are desperate to change the huge majority of public perception that they are responsible for poor Maddie's death,it will be used by their media team extensively as a mantra to sway people.
The McCann's are desperate for you to believe she is still alive, the more they can use that picture to make the public come forward with barely credible sightings, the more they can refuel the ever dwindling list of abductors, which are shot down by those who see through the flimsy charade as quickly as they are put forward.
As Clarence Mitchell has already stated, the abduction theory is nothing more a scenario put forward by the parents.In a clumsy and nonsensical effort to save themselves and those who helped cover up Maddie's death, from jail.

THE ONLY DAY THAT YOU MATTER

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT ?

I am not politically motivated in any way, i really am not. Like most of you, the upcoming election in England has left me cold. I am as guilty as the rest of you. I do not vote.
Like you i considered it a waste of time, i could not be bothered to put a tick or a cross in a box for a crook, a liar or a pedophile. Then i listened to a speech by an actor and i realised that all this time i had been wrong and so have you. So as the man said, here it is, the plain unadulterated, undiluted honest to God truth.

IF YOU DON'T VOTE YOU DON'T MATTER !!

That's right so you understand clearly that for everyday for four years you do not matter ! You really don't, except for one day.
That's right the only day you matter to the people who make the laws, destroy your lives, steal your money, frack under your homes, poison your water and fiddle with children without going to jail is on the day they need you to elect them to carry on doing all those things.
That's the day they worry about you, they worry that you may not be bothered, they worry that you might vote for the other guy. trust me it's not you they worry for. Tell me honestly when did your local MP knock on your door and ask you how you are, what he can do for you, since you elected him to represent you ? When ?.
In almost every single case i know the answer..NEVER.

So if you do not vote they can carry on can they not ? After all enough lemmings will keep them in a job for the next four years. I always thought that they are just as bad as each other so i cannot be bothered, i was wrong, there is another way.
It is simply this, get registered and go and vote for an INDEPENDENT, someone who WILL listen, someone who will fight your corner. It only requires you to get up and go and do it, take a friend with you, not as a protest but as a positive action. Dare to be different, dare to kick his or her comfy arse back to reality.
If you don't do this, if you allow political promises to make you vote for one of these invertebrates, then do me a favour please. Go and join the other sheep until it's time for the abbatoir and make sure you shut the gate firmly behind you on the way in as i did on the way out.

I MATTER, WHAT ABOUT YOU ?

JASMINE... THE TWIT OF TWITTER

HOW FRAUD IS ACCEPTABLE

The other night in my hourly sojourn onto Twitter, i was once again assailed on the McCann hash tag by a supporter of the parents named Jasmine.
Now to give you a tiny bit of background, when i first ventured onto Twitter, she (one assumes ) , for like most trolls it does not use it's proper name, tweeted a reply. Fair dinkum, everyone is entitled to their opinion and it is always entertaining to watch people fumbling about in the dark with blinkers on trying to defend a hopeless position,. I always liken it to an amateur player in Chess, five pieces down and instead of admitting certain defeat they stumble on in blind hope that checkmate is not just round the corner.Entertaining but useless.

So it was with this Jasmine entity, a notorious troll on behalf of the couple who jumps into your Twitter page with a reply and then when you have the temerity to reply pointing out the errors made, gets quite abusive and tells you she wants nothing to do with you and that you are blocked.

Fair enough.

Then tweets replies to you again and again, not general tweets but actually to you. Sooo you remind them they tweeted and engaged you in conversation first and ask why are you doing so only to be greeted with total denial of ever having done so ! WTF ?.
Then you realise that the McCann supporters like the McCann's are exactly the same. If someone points out where the huge gaping holes are, then they deny that the hole was ever there and neatly step into the yawning chasm of idiotic contradiction. The other game they like to try and play is defend the indefensible.

So we have had the starter, now for the main course.

I tweeted the other night the disgraceful fraud that goes on with the FIND MADDIE FUND.

Quite simply, the fund has been used to do almost everything the McCann's need to pay for including paying the mortgage,whistle blowing ( for good quality bogus leads ), solicitors, internet services and many more besides finding Maddie.
I once asked the McCann's for a monetary breakdown as to how the money had been spent, it was not forthcoming.
So my question quite reasonably is how can money donated  to finding a little girl be used to pay someone's mortgage, among other things, without being fraud.

The money was not used for the purpose intended and for the reason the public donated it !

If ,when i do my next charity run for Cancer Research, keep the money and get my car fixed and say i need it to attend future runs on their behalf, that's obviously OK then.

Would people have donated money to pay the McCann's mortgage or for libel experts ?  One thinks and sincerely hopes not. Fraud then.

If two years down the line i then change the mission statement to a wide ranging scope of monetary use after much criticism for the fraudulent use of the fund. Did i not commit fraud with the vast bulk of those donations ?

Now Jasmine bless her stated that it was OK to use the fund to pay the mortgage as dear old Kate paid it back
Wow ! That's alright then.

Dear old Kate she said paid it back out of money raised from the fictional book she wrote.

Both accounts controlled by Team McCann !!!!????

Nothing wrong then Met Police ? No ? Nothing ?

So there you have it, fraud is legal according to the McCann's, Jasmine and it would seem the Metropolitain Police...

GOOD LORD !

MADDIE ... THE UNPLEASANT TRUTH

ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR £10 MILLION

How can one really sum up what has happened to an utterly bogus abduction investigation into a totally bogus abduction story ? I suppose it is a bit like searching for Atlantis in Narnia really.
A media frenziedly reporting on an event that never happened in a desperate bid to convince the public that the Loch Ness monster was seen in a bar in Morocco.

Quite which part were we supposed to believe ? Have a think about it in these terms and all really does become quite clear.
The police, the government and the media would like you to believe that the McCann's checked diligently on their children... hmmm not according to those that were there. That contaminating any crime scene or searching for Maddie was less important that writing a hastily scribbled timeline on a sticker book whilst having a few friends round, presumably in a circle and singing Kumbaya.
Guaranteeing that everyone was singing from the same sheet was vividly more important, obviously, than searching high and low yet they have the cheek to scream about lack of early roadblocks !T

Then we are asked to suspend belief that Jane Tanner's evidence, that they swore as gospel,  is actually bogus and not worth the paper it was written on. Neatly sidestepping the fact that the Met Police could not find anyone within the time frame to pin it on, so needed to once again, move the goalposts.
We are expected to believe that the McCann's are wronged parents who suffered the ultimate tragedy when in reality the ultimate tragedy was the fact that Maddie had that awful couple for parents.
Imagine the scenario of the sainted couple being in charge of your children that night ? Are you seriously going to tell me that if they left your children totally unsupervised in a strange environment whilst buggering off to a bar to quaff copious amounts of vino, you would not want them charged for blatantly and WILLFULLY endangering your children ?
Ok so you are a little bit fluffy and still have some sympathy for the grief stricken ?, lemons. So, on top of that, you are now informed that two highly trained British police dogs, whom police rely upon so much that they have never once questioned their abilities, highlight utterly damning evidence that your child died in that apartment and the body has been removed. It is also proven beyond question that no one else's fingerprints are in the apartment. How's that warm fuzzy feeling for Kate & Gerry ?.
Kate then does not say that the dogs are wrong till much later, preferring instead ( bet she wished she hadn't ! ) to tell you that she stinks of rotting corpses because she examined dead bodies in her holiday clothes whilst carrying your child's toy. Still warm and fuzzy ?.
Ok then, how about if they tell you that they were only a few yards away and you find out, no they bloody well weren't !. No ? I can see you still need convincing !
How about if they tell you it was like being in our own back garden ?
 Will you be asking the question " Just how many fucking tourists come traipsing through your back garden in an evening then." ?

I can see you apprehensively rubbing your McCann worry beads, only £3.99 in the gullible shop, as light dawns on marble head. Despite heroic attempts to pin it on everyone from dead pedophiles to dead tractor driving black junkies it turns out the only people to still in the frame are the ones you charged with her care in the first place.
So the media, the police and the government all tell you the parents had nothing to do with it, believing that utter nonsense are you ?
Then you probably think the police are going to be asking them questions right soon eh ?

 WAKEY WAKEY !  You were off in dreamland there for a minute. Do you really think that the police having sunk £10 million into a total waste of time, are going to hold their hands up and say " Geez guys sorry about that, looks like the buggers were responsible all along! "

If you did or do then you are i am sure, well meaning, but i need to ask you the same question. Are you in on it like the police ? Or just too dumb to see the red Herring they are slapping you across the face with ?.

The investigation into any parental involvement was and is just like Maddie, i believe.....

Dead in the water.

ARMSTRONG ARROGANCE

CYCLIST'S BLEATING IS HARD TO BEAR

Once again the prattling whine of Lance Armstrong can be heard in another world " exclusive ", which is no more than a thinly veiled PR exercise to gain support for the absolutely absurd idea of allowing him to compete in competitive cycling again.

What on earth are you doing Lance ? What the hell are you thinking ? You were caught, you cannot pretend that you are not caught cheating." But lots of people have", insists the nasal twang, which is very true, none more so than in Spain where hundreds of cheats in all types of sports breathed a collective sigh of relief when the judge ordered bags ( literally ) to be destroyed. Quite a few very eminent Spaniards wriggled off the hook. However Armstrong, once the biggest of fishes, did not.

Now many have been caught cheating and in this Lance is quite right. What Lance seems unable to truly comprehend is the scale of, not only the cheating, but the lives he destroyed in the process of doing so and then covering it up.
On many many occasions huge pressure was brought to bear on riders to cheat by Armstrong under immense peer pressure, we can argue they should have been stronger in mind, than to be bullied into taking drugs. On that one, how much glamour is attached to the life of a drug supplier the gangster and how much maligned is the taker, the waste of space.Every time i turn on the splendid film Layer Cake i watch friends rejoice in the roles of Michael Gambon and Daniel Craig, who have the money and the girls and yet we laugh at the three junkies on the sofa, as being weak.One reason why many, i suspect did not come forward.

But far worse than that, not only did Armstrong consign decent riders who rode clean, to the dustbin of history,( can you name the guy who finished in 20th place in this year's Tour De France ? No.. nor can i !) , but finished those unwilling to cheat or expose him.

So imagine the deflated  look on the poor bastard in most of the races in 1990's who knew he was the only one riding clean and that most of those above him cheated ?
I once had a discussion with a top sportsman on this issue and his response was that Armstrong was being made a scapegoat, to my eternal shame he was a fellow Australian. It seems to be the accepted norm that it is OK to do it if you can get away with it.
I am sorry that is a ridiculous and pathetic statement and totally devalues those honest sportsmen and women who diligently and fairly compete in the sport they love.

When not able to bully or browbeat into silence anyone not on his page, he would  make absolutely certain that person was gagged or completely ostracised within his sport, rather like the McCann's do now with anyone questioning them in life.

So no Lance you cannot ride again !

Your punishment is FAR LESS than you truly deserve !

LEYLAND INQUEST SHAMBLES MISSES THE POINT

THE SIDESTEP QUEEN

Mike Brearley once called Ian Bothan the " sidestep queen " in an effort to make him bowl better against my fellow countrymen. It worked.It seems though that the real " sidestep queen " revealed herself in all her glory today at the Brenda Leyland inquest.

In a staggering display of fence sitting, the Coroner Catherine Mason did exactly what the McCann's, Clarence Mitchell, Rupert Murdoch,Martin Brunt and a whole host of internet trolls working on behalf of the McCann's wanted , namely not apportioning any blame for Brenda Leyland's death to anyone, directly or indirectly responsible for it.
What is even more galling was the utter nonsense spouted at the inquest which was used as nothing but a forum not for absolution, but for claims that are just downright lies !

But lets begin with what the Coroner Catherine Mason did and did not say shall we ? Firstly Mason stated  she did not think that anyone could have known that Leyland would take her own life.

WHAT ?? !!

So when Martin Brunt told the inquest that Brenda Leyland had told him she was thinking of ending it all ?? No ? Nothing ? No alarm bells went off ?.

So did Brunt suffer from selective memory ? Did he not know that Brenda Leyland had a standing in the community she cherished and that his report might have a devastating effect on fragile woman ?

Did he not really speak to anyone who knew her beforehand when this would have been revealed ?. Did Mason really believe what she was saying ? What she was really NOT saying was that Brunt was the catalyst for Brenda Leyland's death.
What she was NOT saying was that Brunt's urge to go after this defenceless woman far outstripped his concern for her well-being. On at least five occasions the Murdoch/Mitchell/McCann alliance has gone after people tweeting against the McCann's exposing them in the media and making their lives a living hell when they have not courted the interest of the juggernaut that eventually crushed Brenda Leyland.

Crucially not ONE of the vile internet trolls SUPPORTING the McCann's has EVER  been exposed or hounded in such a way.

Hardly fair or unbiased reporting so that shows that the Murdoch press is totally FOR the parents and revels in reporting Clarence Mitchell's ( A good friend of Murdoch') every sound byte on behalf of the teetotal saints.

How Jonathan Levy is that proportionate or fair ?

Sky News then uttered the mealy-mouthed statement using the time honoured phrases used when they overstep the mark, such as tragic, unforeseen and sincere.

They then told a partial truth stating they acted within editorial guidelines,they certainly did exactly what they were told. It was not responsible journalism in any way, they did not even have the good grace to apologise.
It certainly was not in the public interest, it was in the McCann's interest, because in a survey of over 6;000 people, 78% BELIEVE THEM TO BE GUILTY.

The public interest then is to see them behind bars, so on this issue and one other, i state quite clearly that you are an outright liar  Jonathan! The other issue Jonathan i will come to a minute.

So at the end of the day Mason absolved anyone of blame by not addressing the issue that all Coroners are put into place for in the first place, there is more than one way to state the cause of death. Suicide, OK fair enough.
Caused by by a chain of events that went... Internet McCann watchdogs sent a dossier to the police, the McCann's,Mitchell, Sky and anyone else who might listen. So instead of letting the police deal with it, no cause for further action from them, the McCann's and their chums go into full swing and that ultimately results in Brenda Leyland's death, the police did not cause it !

So finally Jonathan Levy if the McCann's have no " significant presence " on social media, how did the dossier get to the police and the press and have Gerry and Clarence, in the press, saying something must be done !

WHAT WAS THAT THEN JONATHAN ? A FUCKING ACCIDENT ? 

LEYLAND BEARING THE BRUNT OF TWITTER

THE BEAR PIT OF HASHTAG McCANN

I was warned that going on to the #McCann on Twitter would open my eyes to a world of  vile and shocking trolling. I was however, not expecting it to come from the supporters of the McCann's called " Pro's " but rather from those labelled "  Anti ".

To be fair, it is not all one way traffic but one carriageway is far busier than the other. Some of it can be pretty unpleasant and even when not conversing with them they make it their business to come after you.
One would think that you would avoid, unless directly " tweeted " to, contact with those of what you would consider, a different opinion. Not a bit of it ! The speed and violence of the keyboard warriors employed by Team McCann, yes i did say employed, is quite disturbing and not a little alarming.

So it was with Brenda Leyland, who found herself frustrated as many have, that justice for Maddie has been warped into a money making gift that keeps on giving for reprehensible parents with not a shred of humanity, who took to Twitter to vent her frustration, not always in the wisest way and found herself, isolated and targeted by a machine determined to crush her to silence and contrition.

That some of her anger and frustration leaked onto social media is without question but was it really so bad that with vigorous glee the pack of wolves descended on her.
For without any question whatsoever meetings would have happened, strategy discussed and a full profile compiled before the McCann's and those seeking to protect them decided that Brenda Leyland was just the " soft " target they needed to fire a warning shot across the bows of those who know a little girl died because of either the parents gross neglect and child abuse or plain old fashioned manslaughter or murder.

The reprehensible and sickening tweets sent to her by Jayelles, Safari Sara, Justine and many others were as nothing to what awaited her.
There is no question that the McCann internet Doberman's are well acquainted with the police, the media, Clarence Mitchell and the McCann's, they are most certainly not a separate entity !
So Martin Brunt was dispatched by his employer Rupert Murdoch ( he of the commissioned Swann & Summers thinly veiled pre-cursor attack), to reduce Brenda Leyland to a nervous wreck, afraid to leave the house and then afraid to stay at home and ultimately afraid to live.

Martin has sold his soul to the devil on more than a few occasions, but none quite as awful as this. The McCann's, Mitchell and their media mafia are without challenge and they reveled in it, dancing on the grave was the order of the day, whilst those who had the greatest hand in it, put on their tin hats, hunkered down and waited for the storm to blow over.
It never will, they thought they had killed a monster but actually created a martyr, a rallying call for all others seeking some justice for Maddie." Remember Brenda " may become as symbolic as " Justice for Maddie " has become.

So poorly done was it that Team McCann are desperate to get some favourable headlines knowing full well that the inquest into Brenda Leyland's death is right around the corner. Even for Team McCann that is a new low and poorly done indeed.
Let no one forget that the McCann's, Clarence Mitchell, Martin Brunt and the army of trolls they employ are all equally responsible for Brenda Leyland's demise, just as much as the they, along with the Met police and the government, protect those who commit child abuse in one form or another.

Jayelles  i know for a fact was instrumental in helping hound this poor woman to death it is entirely proper that she should not be allowed to hide behind anonymity.Previously the real name of Jayelles was mentioned here it has been taken down until further clarification is certain.

.