CAMERON SHOWS PROTECTION FOR MP'S IS A GREATER CONCERN

ROCK AND A HARD PLACE

The main question should not be wether or not to vote for a man determined to cover up a cover up, that for any sane human being should be a given. I would go so far as to say that voting for Cameron at the next election would be tantamount to a silent acceptance of child abuse within his own party.

Corruption at government levels is rife, we all know that. Whomever is elected you will not stop it, we all know that too. It is an impossible task because as humans we all suffer weaknesses and some have become so depressed by it, that they do not bother to vote at all.
As the saying goes the only thing that allows evil to flourish is when good people do nothing, not casting a vote at a general election is doing just that. Can you imagine though if you dared to vote for an independent or for a party who absolutely refused to block any investigation into child sex abuse ?

The only way to actually get to the truth is to vote for someone who is willing to do something about it ! Can you imagine if the average turnout of say 65% became 100%. Think about it for a second, all those votes would become vital. I am not saying that will come to pass but unless we start to take steps now, we are giving a green light for those in the House of Commons to continue their disgusting exploitation of our nation's children.
What i am saying is make it an issue with every parliamentary candidate who turns up at your door. Then it becomes an issue, suddenly a party may run on child protection being a policy not an afterthought.
What Cameron did in calling those seeking to bring justice against monsters protected by the police and judges creeping around Whitehall, conspiracy theorists was nothing more than a disgraceful and disgusting throw away sound byte.

Now despite D notices ( reporting restrictions ) on some goings on, the SS Pedophile is beginning to take on water, never mind serving up ex-celebrities for a small stint in jail, never mind sending officers of the law who are supposed to protect it's citizens to remove evidence or threaten those who have seen and dare to speak out.

The red herring of a government inquiry into lost dossiers is an absolute sham.

Do you think for one moment that if it was a list of monetary party contributors or a dossier on a terrorist cell that it would have been misplaced. The so called inquiry has been blocked and stymied at every turn just to make doubly sure it never comes out. I can tell you for a fact that many suffering abuse and those who have seen abuse take place and reported it, have in most cases been told in no uncertain terms that it is " difficult " to proceed.

I can also state with absolute certainty that Jimmy Saville and Leon Brittain were never going to face charges whilst alive and neither will Cliff " Kitty " Richard or Ken Clarke.
The list is endless and it stretches into almost every power group,The politicians, the police and the judges who protect them and the Councillors and high profile children's charity workers who have either aided and abetted the procurement of children or turned a blind eye to it.
Don Hale is to be saluted but he knew the review was a complete waste of time. Even the dossier compiled by Geoffrey Dickens could not be traced and Leon Brittain conveniently died sparing many blushes.

To vote for anyone not making child abuse wether historic or current ( do not be fooled that it is not ) is failing all our children in the future.
I want you to think of just one thing here, god forbid it should ever happen. If you were wiped out as parents in a car crash tomorrow how safe do you really think your children would be with pedophiles at every level of running our society ?
When you have a band of MP's wanting to LOWER the age of sexual consent do you really think that is to stop teenage pregnancy !! Please.

I will be asking many searching questions when prospective candidates knock at my door, as for Cameron's party i will not even bother.

 

MOBILE MANSLAUGHTER

ONE STEP AWAY FROM DISASTER

It is our own vanity that causes these entirely preventable accidents, i am as guilty as everyone else of doing exactly what i am about to describe.

Last week i was pulled over by the police and shown the last mile of their interesting recording and, although let off with just a warning, i was stunned at what i saw !

I was on my hands free mobile and had slowed to forty five miles an hour in a sixty speed zone, i had twice wandered across the road, not far and not in the other lane, but erratically. The fluctuation in my speed compared to my normal driving whilst not engaged on the hands free was also strange.

Very kindly, after a ten minute chat and a stern warning, i was on my way, not a little embarrassed and chastened by my pricked ego.

You see, i like everybody else had assumed i was driving perfectly well, i am assured by police that it is a popular misconception, most of us, will defend quite vigorously our own driving skill whilst blasting the horn and gesturing angrily at any of the many miscreants who dare to drive terribly in our presence.

In the last week having been well and truly slapped awake as to my own driving behaviour, i have easily observed others using either mobiles whilst driving, they are not difficult to spot at all, i was surprised to find their actions mirrored almost exactly my own. No doubt followed by the same hot protestations should their poor concentration be highlighted by anyone.

Give it a try people, just a few hours on the road and you will find any number of the " Does not affect my driving " members club. After further research i was staggered in one sense but not staggered in another, it dawned on me that the popular misconception we have is also a deadly one.

Over 40% of road traffic accidents show that one or more persons were in conversation on a mobile phone, either pressed to their ear or on the hands free. The first thing the police do now, is to ask you to hand over your mobile phone at the scene of an accident, be in no doubt, if they find you were on the phone a myriad of charges depending on the severity of the accident, will be coming your way !

I would just like to thank the police officers concerned for giving my vanity balloon a prick which is what they probably thought i was and what i certainly think of anyone using one whilst driving in front or alongside me.

You may think you are a cross between Lewis Hamilton, Lord Alan Sugar and Captain Kirk with that Bluetooth thing in your ear, you most assuredly, are not.

FACEBOOK AND THE McCANN'S

BLOCKING AND TRACKING

I was made fully aware that should i open a Facebook account, not something i have previously  been part of, then certain subjects would upset people, especially those seeking from preventing the truth coming out.

As a social experiment i was prepared to open one up and befriend a few well know and knowledgeable people regarding the McCann affair. Within a week, the Facebook account has been suspended and i am required to give all my personal details to Facebook before i am allowed to access it. The fact that they have my phone numbers and could easily ring me matters not a jot.

One can only surmise that having access to privileged information and making it open to public scrutiny has caused a few feathers to be ruffled. Firstly, i do not feel it necessary to give my birth certificate, passport, bank details or household bills with my address on it, to a faceless Facebook entity who despite promises to the contrary, could release that information to anyone.

A fan of big brother i am not, so i will not be furnishing them with the requested information. Firstly it is a massive invasion of my privacy and i am assured that this is the exception and not the rule.

I am also pretty certain, given one or two phone calls to friends, that only those working on behalf of the McCann's are known for using this tactic on an alarmingly frequent basis.

Firstly the fact that the internet watchdogs employed by the McCann's have this relationship with  Facebook is quite shocking, it is the last time i will scoff at such a suggestion.

However, what is also blindingly obvious is that the watchdogs would not have acted without some instruction from a higher source. Having dug deeper i am now aware of a fully functioning group specifically designed to scour the internet, with the remit to shut down anyone getting a little too close for comfort.

I was preparing to blog about the use of mobile phones whilst driving but this has had to go on the back burner for now. So irritated am i that my journalistic insights are under attack from this quarter that i find myself drawn to out not only the McCann's and their devious methods but also those who skulk behind the facade of credibility.

Hopefully the nice people on Facebook who read this blog may highlight my posts on this matter and if they have any information on these odious people may be infuriated enough to e mail me with any FACTS that they have, i , of course will be doing some digging of my own.

My e-mail is Journalist208@outlook.com which they temporarily got suspended, however one text message sorted that out, Which meant a new SIM card for my mobile. The power of the McCann lobbyists needs watching and highlighting.

In the mean time i will continue to blog on other subjects but i will certainly be looking very thoroughly into the McCanns and their followers through my own sources. Shame on them and shame on Facebook for pandering to those seeking to obstruct truth and justice. Poorly done Facebook, very poorly done.

THE McCANN'S MISERY LEECHES

MILLIONAIRE MADNESS

I must admit to becoming more and more furious with the McCann's and their spokesman Clarence Mitchell and the Murdoch press in general.

Why ? Why am i feeling more and more angry at a couple that are frequently lauded in the media as a grieving couple who, through no fault of their own have cruelly lost a daughter supposedly snatched from the bosom of a loving family?.
Well..... Firstly i have a huge problem after researching the vast amounts of factual documentation regarding the case, that the death of little Maddie ( all facts point to that conclusion ), lies squarely at the door of the parents. One has to be careful as there is a massive amount of theories as to what happened to this little girl and you could spend all day everyday reading this to the detriment of the actual facts.
One argument i can clear up is the nonsense regarding the mother Kate McCann examining dead bodies before going on holiday and giving this as a reason for her clothing smelling of the odour of dead bodies also known as cadaver scent.
After this claim was made by Kate McCann, endorsed and given to the media team it was then given as an unattributed source to a trusted journalist who then floated it to other media outlets, this in our world, is how stories get out without anyone becoming firmly linked as the source.
I am reliably informed by those who know without question that Kate McCann was desperate to come up with a very quick response to the dogs findings.So spooked were they by the findings of the dogs when made public, that they fled Portugal and refused to return until the lead detective on the case, one Goncalo Amaral, was removed from the case.It was knowing what later transpired with a fellow journalist that convinced me of the parents guilt.Having felt something a little fishy with that particular claim ( who didn't? ), he decided to investigate further, finding no evidence of Kate McCann's claims, in fact the more he delved the more it became clear that it was a total fabrication, he wrote it up and not only was it squashed but he was firmly informed that the stance of the Murdoch Group would be firmly in favour of the parents.

Anyway, back to the main point, which is that every time someone goes missing, every time a missing child is found,the parents media team latch onto it with the zeal of a leech homing in on an eighteenth century explorer.
Why is that ? I can explain that quite easily and it is two fold. When a media stance is taken it is incumbent upon the backed party to give huge show of contrition and from that point we can then give them what is effectively a morality car wash.
So having done a tiny bit of contrition at the start, the next step is to paint the party or parties as pristine white or golden who made a mistake under the most unfortunate of mitigating circumstances, the truth has nothing to do with it.
Secondly the Maddie bandwagon may be the gift that keeps on giving in some eyes but it is not the case, rest assured professional help does not come cheap and the many people on the media team, solicitors and internet watchdogs need paying, so raising money to pay these many " free givers of their time " is vital. The donations, from whatever source, need to keep rolling in.

What is particularly galling for me and i hope, thousands of others, is the latest nonsense regarding Zephony Nurse, a baby snatched from the bedside of her mother when just a few days old and dubbed the South African " Maddie ".
Given that Zephony went missing first surely it would be the other way round wouldn't it ? Further investigation on this matter did not take long.
Having heard this story coming through on the wires,it was mentioned in the daily briefings as a human interest story, a wide awake opportunity presented itself and a " stringer " asked the question, i am assured that an amount was proffered and thus " blessings " were bestowed on the parents and for the sake of two hundred Rand, a story is born.
But when you look at the actual facts, the mother was right beside Zephony not some hundred and fifty yards away getting tipsy with her friend. Zephony's mother could see her and hear her, the McCann's could not.
Any resemblance to the McCann case is entirely spurious but we must not let that get in the way of a good story or the possibility of more donations, the mortgage may be paid on money donated but the staff still need paying.

VAN GAAL AND GIGGS...UNITED DIVIDED

THE STORY NO ONE CAN PRINT

One of the great things about being freelance is not having to pander to a newspapers " official " stance on any given matter. Rest assured if you refuse to do so it can cost you your job and injunctions can follow to stop you telling what you know. Added to this is the threat of making every door of every newspaper tightly closed in terms of future employment.

What it does do however is empower you to be able to tell the truth albeit unpaid, it also allows your colleagues in the media to furnish you with stories that they simply cannot tell for one reason or another, that is where the likes of journalists made " unemployable " can get the real truth out into the world.

In this case, that is exactly what has happened.

There is no question that Van Gaal is not a man most journalists warm to, sometimes he can seem aloof, arrogant and generally gives of an air of someone explaining himself to an idiot who's comprehension of tactics is nowhere near his tactical ingenuity.
The pack of wolves are already howling and are perfectly positioned to blow his house of cards down. He has not made too many friends and when things go wrong there are not too many sympathetic ears. Certainly his default tactic when things go wrong of long ball to Fellani has been seized upon in no time, by enemies and fair weather allies alike.

What, however, is far worse than the obvious stalking horse for Ryan Giggs in Paul Scholes who is ready to slaughter anyone who is not Giggs when United lose, but the player himself.
Having already seen off Moyes with barely concealed contempt, he is now undermining Van Gaal with the players in a show of duplicity normally reserved for his own brother. It is an open secret among journalists that another night of the long knives awaits and that Giggs has the sharpener.

Anyone spending over £150m in transfer funds and having a limited ambition of finishing fourth and struggling to do so, is quite rightly going to come under intense scrutiny, but you do not need your so called trusted backroom staff complete with beard playing Judas Iscariot.
At least three extremely respected journalists have been told they cannot " break " this story. The line is to "serve up " Van Gaal first, which is now in full swing, to my mind it is not without merit.

What is entirely without merit is, after already seeing off one manager to practice the age old adage of it being necessary to get squarely behind someone before stabbing them in the back.

BASHING THE POMS

WHAT'S THE WORST THAT CAN HAPPEN ?

As an Australian journalist living in England, we normally say getting stuck into the poms is " fair game ". Most of the time it's good old fashioned banter. We delight, on the odd occasion when you win, in handing you your medals and saying " Here's your medal, don't wear it in the bath, not that there's much chance of that !".

We normally enjoy giving you " a proper serve " as we call it. This time fellas it is entirely justified. As i write i can hear the song in my head " DR. PEPPERRRRR ! " , which, for those not in the know, are a series of embarrassing moments in life accompanied by the catch phrase " What's the worst that can happen ! ".
Well pretty much a national disaster, that many many people having a good knowledge of the game, no not anyone employed currently at the ECB, saw coming a mile off.

Lets look at that shall we ?

Firstly, your most talented player having fallen out of favour with the current coach, hands up those who thought that would happen, sitting on the sidelines laughing his chuff off, with the aid of the reptilian Morgan, Piers not the Irishman.
Difficult ? Probably. Self serving ? certainly, Manageable ? not according to those in positions able to do something about it. We have one of those by the name of Warner, who could have a scrap over a game of solitaire and another called Watson, who can be a bit of a winker at times. We managed it, emphasis on the word manage there.

So far no points then for man management.You have a chairman who has a modest test record at best have been appointed in some haste from his role as a banker, yes..i did say banker !Downton may well find himself with a extra consonant added to his name as a parting gift for his role in this debacle.
Then their was the ex -coach Flower having put large footprints all over the departure of KP along with others, such as Richard Halsall the one time England fielding coach who now works with the Bangladesh team.
Ahhhh lie back in the bath tonight with a cigar son ! Life gives us these little moments to cherish

You then appoint a crap county coach, leave Carberry, Stokes Rankin Gurney and Mills at home, put Hales on the bench and hope things turn out well.
Hmmm what was that saying about proper planning preventing piss poor performance ? You appoint a captain who cannot buy a run and wouldn't be allowed near the titanic so bad is his captaincy in all forms of the game, then sack him in favour of an Irishman who cannot buy a run and has all the menace and force of a squeaky toy.

Rankin and Morgan should have dusted off their passports before the trip to Sri Lanka, which is a bit like going to the Sudan to prepare for a race across the North Pole and all the time you think everything is rosy in the garden.You pick, pardon the pun, James " Apple tree " Aanderson, so called because he only flourishes in certain parts of England and  Stuart " Twitter " Broad , nothing like telling the enemy you are shell shocked eh Stuey ?

There is only one man who deserves an enormous amount of credit in the entire England camp, with no test match experience whatsoever, he has traumatised Steven Finn and has turned your bowling attack to putty in a matter of months !
He deserves the freedom of our fair country and i say this to him with love in my heart.

DAVID SAKER, ENGLAND BOWLING COACH RETURN TO BASE, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED !

THREE CARD TRICK

Once again we have an utterly transparent attempt to track people's movements under the guise of securing our homes and those dwelling there ! Really ? Honestly ? Hmm Ok lets have a closer look.

The government scheme, were it to be introduced could monitor even more movements from those of a more dubious nature. We are told that it could make our persons and our children safer from an intrusion wether it be a burglar or someone preying violently on our person or our children.

This from a government who have systematically failed in making our persons or our children safe by installing copious amounts of CCTV in public areas. This from a government who have spectacularly failed to safeguard children from it's own house of representatives for the very people they are meant to serve. 

The very people who have failed to bring child abuse charges against it's own members and associates for the disgusting incidents at Elm House !

Are we really that stupid as to swallow that nonsense ? Would the government like to clarify it's position on this ? Will it be used to monitor and remove incriminating evidence against them as it was by the police under the direction of the government, when they visited Elm House workers to silence them from reporting the goings on there ?

I THINK WE HAD BETTER THINK IT OUT AGAIN !

Added to which, CCTV does not really stop those hell bent on criminal activity, all it does is give a visual record of what occurs, that, of course, is if the wrongdoer forgets his balaclava or motorcycle helmet.

While we are labouring the point, what is the point ? For on some rather special occasions the CCTV footage, we are informed, is either unavailable or simply it transpires that the camera's are turned off or pointing the wrong way !

Please see the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon and the death of Princess Diana.If the authorities are to be believed on those two matters, which they are most assuredly not, then two greater howlers one could not imagine.

Rather i think it might be used to subvert anyone not singing from the same hymn sheet. I can see those seeking answers to questions the governments do not want asked getting a rather subtle working over, or if it looks as though they may be getting near the truth, they always paint them as odd before having an internal investigation pointing out that you locked yourself in a holdall in a bathtub !

I for one am not buying their making a safer world Newspeak for one moment. Might i suggest that you do not either.

THANKS FOR LISTENING....ERR READING...ERR WATCHING !