THE SIDESTEP QUEEN
Mike Brearley once called Ian Bothan the " sidestep queen " in an effort to make him bowl better against my fellow countrymen. It worked.It seems though that the real " sidestep queen " revealed herself in all her glory today at the Brenda Leyland inquest.
In a staggering display of fence sitting, the Coroner Catherine Mason did exactly what the McCann's, Clarence Mitchell, Rupert Murdoch,Martin Brunt and a whole host of internet trolls working on behalf of the McCann's wanted , namely not apportioning any blame for Brenda Leyland's death to anyone, directly or indirectly responsible for it.
What is even more galling was the utter nonsense spouted at the inquest which was used as nothing but a forum not for absolution, but for claims that are just downright lies !
But lets begin with what the Coroner Catherine Mason did and did not say shall we ? Firstly Mason stated she did not think that anyone could have known that Leyland would take her own life.
WHAT ?? !!
So when Martin Brunt told the inquest that Brenda Leyland had told him she was thinking of ending it all ?? No ? Nothing ? No alarm bells went off ?.
So did Brunt suffer from selective memory ? Did he not know that Brenda Leyland had a standing in the community she cherished and that his report might have a devastating effect on fragile woman ?
Did he not really speak to anyone who knew her beforehand when this would have been revealed ?. Did Mason really believe what she was saying ? What she was really NOT saying was that Brunt was the catalyst for Brenda Leyland's death.
What she was NOT saying was that Brunt's urge to go after this defenceless woman far outstripped his concern for her well-being. On at least five occasions the Murdoch/Mitchell/McCann alliance has gone after people tweeting against the McCann's exposing them in the media and making their lives a living hell when they have not courted the interest of the juggernaut that eventually crushed Brenda Leyland.
Crucially not ONE of the vile internet trolls SUPPORTING the McCann's has EVER been exposed or hounded in such a way.
Hardly fair or unbiased reporting so that shows that the Murdoch press is totally FOR the parents and revels in reporting Clarence Mitchell's ( A good friend of Murdoch') every sound byte on behalf of the teetotal saints.
How Jonathan Levy is that proportionate or fair ?
Sky News then uttered the mealy-mouthed statement using the time honoured phrases used when they overstep the mark, such as tragic, unforeseen and sincere.
They then told a partial truth stating they acted within editorial guidelines,they certainly did exactly what they were told. It was not responsible journalism in any way, they did not even have the good grace to apologise.
It certainly was not in the public interest, it was in the McCann's interest, because in a survey of over 6;000 people, 78% BELIEVE THEM TO BE GUILTY.
The public interest then is to see them behind bars, so on this issue and one other, i state quite clearly that you are an outright liar Jonathan! The other issue Jonathan i will come to a minute.
So at the end of the day Mason absolved anyone of blame by not addressing the issue that all Coroners are put into place for in the first place, there is more than one way to state the cause of death. Suicide, OK fair enough.
Caused by by a chain of events that went... Internet McCann watchdogs sent a dossier to the police, the McCann's,Mitchell, Sky and anyone else who might listen. So instead of letting the police deal with it, no cause for further action from them, the McCann's and their chums go into full swing and that ultimately results in Brenda Leyland's death, the police did not cause it !
So finally Jonathan Levy if the McCann's have no " significant presence " on social media, how did the dossier get to the police and the press and have Gerry and Clarence, in the press, saying something must be done !
WHAT WAS THAT THEN JONATHAN ? A FUCKING ACCIDENT ?